Obama's republic
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Justinian in Cobell v Salazar, Donald Rumsfeld, Drones, Military detention, Roger Fitch Esq, US Presidential election
Justinian in Cobell v Salazar, Donald Rumsfeld, Drones, Military detention, Roger Fitch Esq, US Presidential election
Shock: the rich prefer Obama ... Democrats
outvoted Republicans, but state gerrymanders keep GOP in control of the House
... Recomposition of the ultra-orthodox DC Circuit ... Rumsfeld gets torture
immunity ... Native American compensation claims settled after 16-year class
action ... New policy for drone assassinations ... Roger Fitch reports from
Washington
"The
government consists of a gang of men exactly like you and me. They have, taking
one with another, no special talent for the business of government; they have
only a talent for getting and holding office. Their principal device to that
end is to search out groups who pant and pine for something they can't get and
to promise to give it to them. Nine times out of ten that promise is worth
nothing. The tenth time is made good by looting A to satisfy B. In other words,
government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance
auction sale of stolen goods."
H. L. Mencken (1880-1956)
THE precipitous decline
of the American republic has been slowed - if not arrested - by the re-election
of Mr Obama and the rejection of a Republican Senate.
The pillage du jour - in this case, the
systematic looting of the nation's dwindling assets by Republicans and their
rapacious corporate allies - has been momentarily interrupted.
Still, Mr Obama and the Democrats are not entirely
trustworthy (see below) as the US faces a so-called "fiscal cliff" in
which unpleasant choices in spending cuts may be forced on a recalcitrant
Congress.
Now that it's all over, Obama has survived, perhaps
through the intervention of Mother Nature in the form of the super-storm
Sandy.
The election result was a blow for Rupert Murdoch, who
deployed over 30 of his people nationwide to
campaign for Republicans.
Six
billion dollars may have been spent in this year's
election cycle - over $500 million of it by special
interest groups in the last month.
As it turned out,
the presidential election wasn't even close, historically speaking, but
unpredictable things happened, considering the Republican candidate's wealth
and religion.
The rich apparently preferred Obama, and a greater
percentage of Mormons supported George Bush when he last ran than
supported Romney this year.
With Democrat candidates for Congress receiving more
votes than Republicans, you would think Obama would have a Democrat majority in
the House - as he does in the Senate - but thanks to Republican state-based
gerrymanders, the opposition kept control of the House while losing
the popular vote.
It's one of the few times in the last 100 years that the
losing party in the House still
got control of it.
While Republicans lost the popular vote, they have one
of their biggest House majorities in 60 years. That won't be easy to
change: only 74 of the 435 House districts remain marginal, or "competitive."
The Republicans
still have the edge in statehouses, where gerrymanders of federal
constituencies are made.
Come January the Republicans will have complete control
of 27 states versus 19 for the Democrats. Only three states have split
legislatures, and Nebraska is unicameral.
Some
say the Republicans have lost the culture war.
Perhaps, too, the claim that the US is a "Christian
nation" can
be laid to rest.
The Republican "Southern Strategy" of targeting
"White Anglos" is also breaking down.
With Texas now having a majority-minority population of
55 percent, the days
of Republican-dominance in that state are numbered.
In Florida, another state becoming competitive for
Democrats, there was a gratifying removal of the accused
war criminal Allen West, a Republican, from his House seat. At the
same time, the liberal Florida Democrat Alan Grayson, ousted in the Republican
sweep of 2010, was returned to Congress.
The conservative Washington Post doesn't
like either of them.
There were other pleasing results such as the failure of
big money to
buy influence in state judicial elections.
* *
*
ALTHOUGH federal judges are
not elected, one bright spot in the election may turn out to be the future
composition of the ultra-orthodox DC Circuit.
With Obama having won four more years, David Sentelle,
the most partisan Republican on the DC Court (see my post here) has decided to take senior
status.
There are four vacancies to be filled in DC, a golden
opportunity for Obama to reshape this "second-most important" federal
court and break the ideological edge held by Republican operatives and
"movement conservatives".
With four years, the president hopes to do the same with
the Supreme Court. And with good reason - a new study confirms what we always
knew: conservative
justices invalidate liberal laws, and vice-versa.
* *
*
PRESIDENT Obama is defending
the seemingly unconstitutional provisions of the National Defence
Appropriation Act that purport to allow indefinite
extrajudicial (military) detention of US civilians in the US and abroad.
Sadly, he has the amicus support
of Senate Republicans.
Meanwhile, with the election safely out of the way, DoJ
has signed a sweetheart settlement in the robo-signing
mortgage scandal that makes recovery by civil plaintiffs more
difficult.
* *
*
THE 7th Circuit,
sitting en banc, has overruled a unanimous three-judge appeals panel,
and given former Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld immunity
for torture that he personally ordered.
Jonathan
Hafetz, the Times and
Kevin
Gosztola comment on the case.
* *
*
THE Native American
claims case Cobell finally ground to completion after 16 years when
the DC Circuit signed-off
on the settlement.
The case has a long and sordid history, including
the shock removal by the DC Circuit of the now Senior DC District Court judge,
Royce Lamberth, who imprudently alluded to the racism of the Bureau of Indian
Affairs and held two Secretaries of the Interior in contempt.
The government never did account for the amount of Indian
trust funds converted to other use over the last 135 years.
The $3.4 billion settlement, reached in 2010 but delayed
until Congress appropriated the money, is paltry compared to the loss the
Indians suffered.
* *
*
THE Obama administration
has produced a
policy for drone assassinations at last: they were afraid to leave it to Mr
Romney.
Disturbingly, the Times
saw merit in institutionalising - bureaucratically - a practice long
considered criminal by the US government itself.
It's too late, of course, for Anwar al-Awlaki, the
American who was assassinated by CIA drone in Yemen in 2011.
But, the US is now claiming he was no
longer a citizen anyway when they killed him, and they had been thinking
about charging
him with something.
Meanwhile, though drone due process is still in abeyance
for citizens as well as foreigners, the Pentagon
has decreed that in future, humans must decide before a drone kills
someone.
Now that's comforting.
No comments:
Post a Comment